You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions to reduce suicides at suicide hotspots: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-214 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Georgina R Cox, Christabel Owens, Jo Robinson, Angela Nicholas, Anne Lockley, Michelle Williamson, Yee Tak Derek Cheung, Jane Pirkis |
| Abstract |
'Suicide hotspots' include tall structures (for example, bridges and cliffs), railway tracks, and isolated locations (for example, rural car parks) which offer direct means for suicide or seclusion that prevents intervention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 37% |
| United States | 7 | 16% |
| Sweden | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 37% |
| Scientists | 7 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 41 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 48 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#695,799
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#704
of 17,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,621
of 209,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#3
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.