The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
RICE SEED TREATMENT AND RECOATING WITH POLYMERS: PHYSIOLOGICAL QUALITY AND RETENTION OF CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 1
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Caatinga, December 2017
|
DOI | 10.1590/1983-21252017v30n412rc |
Authors |
LOVANE KLEIN FAGUNDES, UBIRAJARA RUSSI NUNES, OSMAR DAMIAN PRESTES, TIÉLE STUKER FERNANDES, EDUARDO JOSÉ LUDWIG, NATHÁLIA SAIBT |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 14% |
Researcher | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 36% |
Chemistry | 1 | 7% |
Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Caatinga
#39
of 46 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,813
of 444,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Caatinga
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one scored the same or higher as 7 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them