You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PD-1 Blockade in Mismatch Repair–Deficient, Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa2201445 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Cercek, Melissa Lumish, Jenna Sinopoli, Jill Weiss, Jinru Shia, Michelle Lamendola-Essel, Imane H El Dika, Neil Segal, Marina Shcherba, Ryan Sugarman, Zsofia Stadler, Rona Yaeger, J Joshua Smith, Benoit Rousseau, Guillem Argiles, Miteshkumar Patel, Avni Desai, Leonard B Saltz, Maria Widmar, Krishna Iyer, Janie Zhang, Nicole Gianino, Christopher Crane, Paul B Romesser, Emmanouil P Pappou, Philip Paty, Julio Garcia-Aguilar, Mithat Gonen, Marc Gollub, Martin R Weiser, Kurt A Schalper, Luis A Diaz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5,884 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 962 | 16% |
| Turkey | 241 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 190 | 3% |
| Germany | 144 | 2% |
| Mexico | 136 | 2% |
| Spain | 131 | 2% |
| Canada | 110 | 2% |
| India | 109 | 2% |
| Italy | 68 | 1% |
| Other | 858 | 15% |
| Unknown | 2935 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4576 | 78% |
| Scientists | 771 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 460 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 76 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 692 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 692 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 93 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 80 | 12% |
| Other | 56 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 42 | 6% |
| Other | 131 | 19% |
| Unknown | 243 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 184 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 85 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 29 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 25 | 4% |
| Other | 67 | 10% |
| Unknown | 273 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7786. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#328
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#35
of 32,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13
of 449,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#2
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 123.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.