The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Does the growing of Bt maize change abundance or ecological function of non-target animals compared to the growing of non-GM maize? A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-022-00272-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Meissle, Steven E. Naranjo, Jörg Romeis |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 11 | 12% |
| France | 10 | 11% |
| United States | 8 | 9% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Belgium | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 40 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 76 | 83% |
| Scientists | 13 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 19% |
| Researcher | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2024.
All research outputs
#295,435
of 26,614,447 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,080
of 453,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,614,447 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them