| Title |
Screening is not always healthy: an ethical analysis of health screening packages in Singapore
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-022-00798-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Ee Fang Yong, Mee Lian Wong, Teck Chuan Voo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 3 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Austria | 1 | 8% |
| Malawi | 1 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Portugal | 1 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 76% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 81% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,215,837
of 23,947,581 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#424
of 1,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,412
of 448,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,947,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.