↓ Skip to main content

Distinct pathways to stakeholder use versus academic contribution in climate adaptation research

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
15 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distinct pathways to stakeholder use versus academic contribution in climate adaptation research
Published in
Conservation Letters, June 2022
DOI 10.1111/conl.12892
Authors

Amanda A. Hyman, Steph L. Courtney, Karen S. McNeal, Lalasia Bialic‐Murphy, Cari S. Furiness, Mitchell J. Eaton, Paul R. Armsworth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 17%
Decision Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,142,571
of 21,615,008 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#425
of 982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,618
of 320,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,615,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.