↓ Skip to main content

Health systems supports for community case management of childhood illness: lessons from an assessment of early implementation in Malawi

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health systems supports for community case management of childhood illness: lessons from an assessment of early implementation in Malawi
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer A Callaghan-Koru, Kate Gilroy, Adnan A Hyder, Asha George, Humphreys Nsona, Angella Mtimuni, Bernie Zakeyo, Josiah Mayani, Cristina V Cardemil, Jennifer Bryce

Abstract

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: National community-based health worker (CBHW) programs often face challenges in ensuring that these remote workers are adequately trained, equipped and supervised. As governments increasingly deploy CBHWs to improve access to primary health care, there is an urgent need to assess how well health systems are supporting CBHWs to provide high quality care. METHODS: This paper presents the results of a mixed-methods assessment of selected health systems supports (supervision, drug supply, and job aids) for a national community case management (CCM) program for childhood illness in Malawi during the first year of implementation. We collected data on the types and levels of drug supply and supervision through a cross-sectional survey of a random sample of Health Surveillance Assistants (HSAs) providing CCM services in six districts. We then conducted in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with program managers and HSAs, respectively, to gain an understanding of the barriers and facilitating factors for delivering health systems supports for CCM. RESULTS: Although the CCM training and job aid were well received by stakeholders, HSAs who participated in the first CCM training sessions often waited up to 4 months before receiving their initial supply of drugs and first supervision visits. One year after training began, 69 % of HSAs had all essential CCM drugs in stock and only 38 % of HSAs reported a CCM supervision visit in the 3 months prior to the survey. Results of the qualitative assessment indicated that drug supply was constrained by travel distance and stock outs at health facilities, and that the initial supervision system relied on clinicians who were able to spend only limited time away from clinical duties. Proactive district managers trained and enrolled HSAs' routine supervisors to provide CCM supervision. CONCLUSIONS: Malawi's CCM program is promising, but health systems supports must be improved to ensure consistent coverage and quality. Mixed-methods implementation research provided the Ministry of Health with actionable feedback that it is using to adapt program policies and improve performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 165 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 16%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 39 23%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 31%
Social Sciences 28 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 15%
Psychology 8 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 36 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,501,073
of 24,217,496 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,122
of 8,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,645
of 295,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#25
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.