You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of fire on spotted owl site occupancy in a late-successional forest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.002 |
| Authors |
Susan L. Roberts, Jan W. van Wagtendonk, A. Keith Miles, Douglas A. Kelt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2018.
All research outputs
#725,714
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#614
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,066
of 190,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#3
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.