You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
A #Pulmcc Twitter Chat to Educate and Advocate for Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep
CHEST, October 2016
Christopher Carroll, Pradeep Ramachandran, Kristi Bruno
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||7||33%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||7||33%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||3||14%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||3||38%|
|Lecturer > Senior Lecturer||1||13%|
|Student > Master||1||13%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Nursing and Health Professions||2||25%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||2||25%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2016.
All research outputs
of 24,147,581 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
of 12,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 329,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,147,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.