↓ Skip to main content

Cough, sarcoidosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: raw nerves and bad vibrations

Overview of attention for article published in Cough, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cough, sarcoidosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: raw nerves and bad vibrations
Published in
Cough, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-9974-9-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Kim Harrison

Abstract

Cough is a common symptom in people who develop interstitial lung diseases (ILD). The pathological features of the ILDs are many and varied suggesting that the cause of cough may also vary with each disease. This article reviews what is currently known about cough in sarcoidosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; two of the commonest ILDs. It also outlines some of the theories which have been proposed to explain why cough develops in these conditions and describes what little is known about how to treat it.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 25%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,211,642
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cough
#16
of 61 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,826
of 207,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cough
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them