↓ Skip to main content

Rise of the Clones: Myelodysplastic Syndrome 
to Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Blood Cancer Discovery, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rise of the Clones: Myelodysplastic Syndrome 
to Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Published in
Blood Cancer Discovery, June 2022
DOI 10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-22-0046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyle A. Romine, Peter van Galen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,892,094
of 21,423,731 outputs
Outputs from Blood Cancer Discovery
#58
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,669
of 181,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Cancer Discovery
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,423,731 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.