You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What does standard rehabilitation practice after total hip replacement in the UK entail? results of a mixed methods study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-91 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tosan Okoro, Ashok Ramavath, Jan Howarth, Jane Jenkinson, Peter Maddison, John G Andrew, Andrew Lemmey |
Abstract |
There is evidence of prolonged poor function in patients following total hip replacement (THR). Studies of progressive resistance training (PRT) interventions to improve function are often compared to 'standard' practice which is not well defined. This study aimed to investigate 'standard' rehabilitation care in the UK after total hip replacement (THR) as well as determine whether PRT was part of 'standard' care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 57% |
Denmark | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 2 | 1% |
Papua New Guinea | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 149 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 38 | 25% |
Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
Researcher | 14 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 13% |
Unknown | 34 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 18% |
Sports and Recreations | 11 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 10% |
Unknown | 36 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,044,046
of 24,777,509 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,317
of 4,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,623
of 200,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#23
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,777,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.