↓ Skip to main content

What does standard rehabilitation practice after total hip replacement in the UK entail? results of a mixed methods study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What does standard rehabilitation practice after total hip replacement in the UK entail? results of a mixed methods study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-91
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tosan Okoro, Ashok Ramavath, Jan Howarth, Jane Jenkinson, Peter Maddison, John G Andrew, Andrew Lemmey

Abstract

There is evidence of prolonged poor function in patients following total hip replacement (THR). Studies of progressive resistance training (PRT) interventions to improve function are often compared to 'standard' practice which is not well defined. This study aimed to investigate 'standard' rehabilitation care in the UK after total hip replacement (THR) as well as determine whether PRT was part of 'standard' care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 2 1%
Papua New Guinea 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 149 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 25%
Student > Master 25 16%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 34 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 18%
Sports and Recreations 11 7%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,044,046
of 24,777,509 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,317
of 4,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,623
of 200,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#23
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,777,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.