Differential prognostic effect of systemic inflammation in patients with non–small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy or chemotherapy: A post hoc analysis of the phase 3 OAK trial
Cancer (0008543X), June 2022
Alessio Cortellini, Biagio Ricciuti, Hossein Borghaei, Abdul Rafeh Naqash, Antonio D'Alessio, Claudia A. M. Fulgenzi, Alfredo Addeo, Giuseppe L. Banna, David James Pinato
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||14||56%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||6||24%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||4%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||6%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||10||19%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||3||6%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||3||6%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,805,946 outputs
Outputs from Cancer (0008543X)
of 13,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 433,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer (0008543X)
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,805,946 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.