You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Abstract 1722: Role of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and spatial immune heterogeneity in sensitivity to PD-1 axis blockers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Research, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-1722 |
| Authors |
Miguel Lopez de Rodas Gregorio, Venkata Nagineni, Arvind Ravi, Ila J. Datar, Mari Mino-Kenudson, German Corredor, Cristian Barrera, Lindsey Behlman, David L. Rimm, Roy S. Herbst, Anant Madabhushi, Jonathan W. Riess, Vamsidhar Velcheti, Matthew Hellmann, Justin F. Gainor, Kurt A. Schalper |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,221,568
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#783
of 18,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,227
of 443,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#19
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.