You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From design to implementation - The Joint Asia Diabetes Evaluation (JADE) program: A descriptive report of an electronic web-based diabetes management program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-10-26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gary T Ko, Wing-Yee So, Peter C Tong, Francois Le Coguiec, Debborah Kerr, Greg Lyubomirsky, Beaver Tamesis, Troels Wolthers, Jennifer Nan, Juliana Chan |
| Abstract |
The Joint Asia Diabetes Evaluation (JADE) Program is a web-based program incorporating a comprehensive risk engine, care protocols, and clinical decision support to improve ambulatory diabetes care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 67% |
| India | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 23% |
| Researcher | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2017.
All research outputs
#13,032,618
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#915
of 1,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,559
of 94,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,980 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.