You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The ecology and evolution of human‐wildlife cooperation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PEOPLE AND NATURE, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/pan3.10369 |
| Authors |
Dominic L. Cram, Jessica E. M. van der Wal, Natalie Uomini, Mauricio Cantor, Anap I. Afan, Mairenn C. Attwood, Jenny Amphaeris, Fatima Balasani, Cameron J. Blair, Judith L. Bronstein, Iahaia O. Buanachique, Rion R. T. Cuthill, Jewel Das, Fábio G. Daura‐Jorge, Apurba Deb, Tanmay Dixit, Gcina S. Dlamini, Edmond Dounias, Isa I. Gedi, Martin Gruber, Lilian S. Hoffmann, Tobias Holzlehner, Hussein A. Isack, Eliupendo A. Laltaika, David J. Lloyd‐Jones, Jess Lund, Alexandre M. S. Machado, L. Mahadevan, Ignacio B. Moreno, Chima J. Nwaogu, Raymond Pierotti, Seliano A. Rucunua, Wilson F. dos Santos, Nathalia Serpa, Brian D. Smith, Hari Sridhar, Irina Tolkova, Tint Tun, João V. S. Valle‐Pereira, Brian M. Wood, Richard W. Wrangham, Claire N. Spottiswoode |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 17% |
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| Japan | 3 | 5% |
| South Africa | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 64% |
| Scientists | 20 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2023.
All research outputs
#418,787
of 24,332,257 outputs
Outputs from PEOPLE AND NATURE
#57
of 463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,292
of 431,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PEOPLE AND NATURE
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,332,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.