↓ Skip to main content

Extinction risk assessment of the world’s seagrass species

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
322 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
751 Mendeley
Title
Extinction risk assessment of the world’s seagrass species
Published in
Biological Conservation, July 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.010
Authors

Frederick T. Short, Beth Polidoro, Suzanne R. Livingstone, Kent E. Carpenter, Salomão Bandeira, Japar Sidik Bujang, Hilconida P. Calumpong, Tim J.B. Carruthers, Robert G. Coles, William C. Dennison, Paul L.A. Erftemeijer, Miguel D. Fortes, Aaren S. Freeman, T.G. Jagtap, Abu Hena M. Kamal, Gary A. Kendrick, W. Judson Kenworthy, Yayu A. La Nafie, Ichwan M. Nasution, Robert J. Orth, Anchana Prathep, Jonnell C. Sanciangco, Brigitta van Tussenbroek, Sheila G. Vergara, Michelle Waycott, Joseph C. Zieman

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 751 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Singapore 2 <1%
Other 11 1%
Unknown 714 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 163 22%
Student > Bachelor 129 17%
Researcher 128 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 117 16%
Other 33 4%
Other 115 15%
Unknown 66 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 310 41%
Environmental Science 245 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 47 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 2%
Engineering 11 1%
Other 25 3%
Unknown 96 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2018.
All research outputs
#573,886
of 13,087,494 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#484
of 3,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#557,274
of 12,482,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#484
of 3,844 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,087,494 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,482,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,844 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.