You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Primary Care vs Specialist Sleep Center Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Daytime Sleepiness and Quality of Life: A Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2013.1823 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ching Li Chai-Coetzer, Nick A. Antic, L. Sharn Rowland, Richard L. Reed, Adrian Esterman, Peter G. Catcheside, Simon Eckermann, Norman Vowles, Helena Williams, Sandra Dunn, R. Doug McEvoy |
| Abstract |
Due to increasing demand for sleep services, there has been growing interest in ambulatory models of care for patients with obstructive sleep apnea. With appropriate training and simplified management tools, primary care physicians are ideally positioned to take on a greater role in diagnosis and treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 196 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 13% |
| Researcher | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 23% |
| Unknown | 54 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 57 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,101,694
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#22,011
of 36,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,902
of 210,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#142
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.