↓ Skip to main content

Improvements of Procedures for Identifying and Classifying Heavy Rainfall Areas of Linear-Stationary Type

Overview of attention for article published in SOLA : Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improvements of Procedures for Identifying and Classifying Heavy Rainfall Areas of Linear-Stationary Type
Published in
SOLA : Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere, January 2022
DOI 10.2151/sola.2022-027
Authors

Yasutaka Hirockawa, Teruyuki Kato

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#5,803,760
of 21,740,538 outputs
Outputs from SOLA : Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere
#63
of 340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,566
of 310,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SOLA : Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,740,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them