↓ Skip to main content

Credibility dilemmas under the Paris agreement: explaining fossil fuel subsidy reform references in INDCs

Overview of attention for article published in International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 295)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Credibility dilemmas under the Paris agreement: explaining fossil fuel subsidy reform references in INDCs
Published in
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, June 2022
DOI 10.1007/s10784-022-09581-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Elliott, Steven Bernstein, Matthew Hoffmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 10 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,424,961
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
#39
of 295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,060
of 429,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.