↓ Skip to main content

Improving spatio-temporal benefit transfers for pest control by generalist predators in cotton in the southwestern US

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems and People, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving spatio-temporal benefit transfers for pest control by generalist predators in cotton in the southwestern US
Published in
Ecosystems and People, October 2016
DOI 10.1080/21513732.2016.1240712
Authors

Ruscena Wiederholt, Kenneth J. Bagstad, Gary F. McCracken, Jay E. Diffendorfer, John B. Loomis, Darius J. Semmens, Amy L. Russell, Chris Sansone, Kelsie LaSharr, Paul Cryan, Claudia Reynoso, Rodrigo A. Medellín, Laura López-Hoffman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Student > Master 4 5%
Professor 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 52 68%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 13%
Environmental Science 9 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Unknown 53 70%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2016.
All research outputs
#6,754,074
of 12,722,978 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems and People
#6
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,319
of 286,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems and People
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,722,978 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them