You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Assessment of influences of cooking on cadmium and arsenic bioaccessibility in rice, using an in vitro physiologically-based extraction test
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food Chemistry, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.06.066 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ping Zhuang, Chaosheng Zhang, Yingwen Li, Bi Zou, Hui Mo, Kejun Wu, Jingtao Wu, Zhian Li |
| Abstract |
The health risks associated with rice consumption may decrease if consumers use cooking practices which can reduce the bioaccessibility of metal(loid)s. The effects of cooking on the Cd and As bioaccessibility, at three contamination levels of rice, were studied. Results indicated that cooking reduced bioaccessibility of Cd and As in rice. Cooking resulted in a significant increase (p<0.01) of Cd and As concentrations in the residual fraction. Low volume water-cooking of rice to dryness reduced total Cd by about 10% for rices A and B, while medium or high volume water-cooking had no effect on Cd bioaccessibility in all rice types. In contrast, low volume cooking did not remove As, but a significant decrease (p<0.05) was observed when cooking with higher volumes of water. This study provides information for a better understanding of more realistic estimation of metal(loid)s exposure from rice and the possible health risks. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 16 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 38% |