↓ Skip to main content

Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
387 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005528.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suthit Khunpradit, Emma Tavender, Pisake Lumbiganon, Malinee Laopaiboon, Jason Wasiak, Russell L Gruen

Abstract

Caesarean section rates are steadily increasing globally. The factors contributing to these observed increases are complex. Non-clinical interventions, those applied independent of patient care in a clinical encounter, may have a role in reducing unnecessary caesarean sections.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
Canada 4 1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 368 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 21%
Researcher 66 17%
Student > Bachelor 56 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 80 21%
Unknown 28 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 171 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 14%
Psychology 37 10%
Social Sciences 30 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 38 10%
Unknown 46 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2020.
All research outputs
#971,803
of 15,421,575 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,753
of 11,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#928,993
of 14,481,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,446
of 9,663 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,421,575 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,481,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9,663 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.