↓ Skip to main content

Lead Toxicity and Environmental Health Justice Stories in Black and White Woodcut Portraits

Overview of attention for article published in AMA Journal of Ethics, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lead Toxicity and Environmental Health Justice Stories in Black and White Woodcut Portraits
Published in
AMA Journal of Ethics, July 2022
DOI 10.1001/amajethics.2022.599
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Omaha, Nebraska, has a lead-contaminated superfund site and substandard housing that pose risks for childhood lead exposure. Healthy Housing Omaha (formerly, Omaha Healthy Kids Alliance), an environmental health nonprofit, partnered with the fourth author, an artist, and a newspaper to raise awareness about lead poisoning by publishing portraits and stories of affected community members. The authors analyzed an interview with the artist, photographs of portraits published in a local newspaper, and quotations from portrait sitters. Shared stories of lead exposure and poisoning conveyed in the portraiture and printmaking processes revealed structural racism as an emergent theme. Arts-based research methods, such as portraiture, can be scaled and applied to support national and international community engagement efforts to advocate for environmental justice and public health.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%