↓ Skip to main content

Conservative interventions for urinary incontinence in women: an Overview of Cochrane systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservative interventions for urinary incontinence in women: an Overview of Cochrane systematic reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012337
Authors

Doreen McClurg, Alex Pollock, Pauline Campbell, Christine Hazelton, Andrew Elders, Suzanne Hagen, David C Hill

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 195 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Researcher 20 10%
Other 14 7%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 58 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 17%
Psychology 20 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 62 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#20,723,696
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,015
of 348,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#224
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.