You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New insights on the biology of swine respiratory tract mycoplasmas from a comparative genome analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-175 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Franciele Maboni Siqueira, Claudia Elizabeth Thompson, Veridiana Gomes Virginio, Taylor Gonchoroski, Luciano Reolon, Luiz Gonzaga Almeida, Marbella Maria da Fonsêca, Rangel de Souza, Francisco Prosdocimi, Irene Silveira Schrank, Henrique Bunselmeyer Ferreira, Ana Tereza Ribeiro de Vasconcelos, Arnaldo Zaha |
| Abstract |
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Mycoplasma flocculare and Mycoplasma hyorhinis live in swine respiratory tracts. M. flocculare, a commensal bacterium, is genetically closely related to M. hyopneumoniae, the causative agent of enzootic porcine pneumonia. M. hyorhinis is also pathogenic, causing polyserositis and arthritis. In this work, we present the genome sequences of M. flocculare and M. hyopneumoniae strain 7422, and we compare these genomes with the genomes of other M. hyoponeumoniae strain and to the a M. hyorhinis genome. These analyses were performed to identify possible characteristics that may help to explain the different behaviors of these species in swine respiratory tracts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 19% |
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 33% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 13 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2013.
All research outputs
#15,266,089
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,666
of 10,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,093
of 196,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#75
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.