You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Immobilized MutS-Mediated Error Removal of Microchip-Synthesized DNA.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 17 |
Book title |
Synthetic DNA
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6343-0_17 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6341-6, 978-1-4939-6343-0
|
Authors |
Wen Wan, Dongmei Wang, Xiaolian Gao, Jiong Hong |
Editors |
Randall A. Hughes |
Abstract |
Applications of microchip-synthesized oligonucleotides for de novo gene synthesis are limited primarily by their high error rates. The mismatch binding protein MutS, which can specifically recognize and bind to mismatches, is one of the cheapest tools for error correction of synthetic DNA. Here, we describe a protocol for removing errors in microchip-synthesized oligonucleotides and for the assembly of DNA segments using these oligonucleotides. This protocol can also be used in traditional de novo gene DNA synthesis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
China | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 49 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 34% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 26% |
Chemistry | 4 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2016.
All research outputs
#18,478,448
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,926
of 13,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,506
of 420,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#691
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.