| Title |
Ethical values and principles to guide the fair allocation of resources in response to a pandemic: a rapid systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-022-00806-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lydia O’Sullivan, Edelweiss Aldasoro, Áine O’Brien, Maeve Nolan, Cliona McGovern, Áine Carroll |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 6 | 67% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,410,614
of 23,505,064 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#258
of 1,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,013
of 437,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.