You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A “Wear and Tear” Hypothesis to Explain Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2016.00180 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eran Elhaik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 30 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 6% |
| Scientists | 3 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 17% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 30% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#493,311
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#169
of 14,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,458
of 321,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#2
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.