↓ Skip to main content

Modeling the indirect economic implications of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling the indirect economic implications of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-11-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy M Dall, Paul Gallo, Lane Koenig, Qian Gu, David Ruiz

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disorders impose a substantial economic burden on American society, but few studies have examined the economic benefits associated with treating such disorders. The purpose of this research is to estimate the indirect economic implications of activity limitations associated with musculoskeletal disorders and to quantifying the potential economic gains from elective surgery to treat arthritis of the knee and hip.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Japan 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
Unknown 73 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 17%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 8 10%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 7 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,501,225
of 14,024,149 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#75
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,097
of 148,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,024,149 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them