↓ Skip to main content

Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of psychiatric practice (Print), March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 353)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis
Published in
Journal of psychiatric practice (Print), March 2013
DOI 10.1097/01.pra.0000428562.86705.cd
Pubmed ID
Authors

STEPHEN A. RYAN, DANIEL J. COSTELLO, EUGENE M. CASSIDY, GEMMA BROWN, HUGH J. HARRINGTON, SANDER MARKX

Abstract

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis is a newly described form of encephalitis associated with prominent psychiatric symptoms at onset. Recognition of the symptom complex is the key to diagnosis. Most patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis develop a multistage illness that progresses from initial psychiatric symptoms to memory disturbance, seizures, dyskinesia, and catatonia. Psychiatric manifestations include anxiety, mania, social withdrawal, and psychosis (i.e., delusions, hallucinations, disorganized behavior). The disorder is more common in females (80%), in approximately half of whom it is associated with an underlying ovarian teratoma. Treatment involves immunosuppression, with steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin considered first line. The disorder is particularly relevant to psychiatrists, because most patients are initially seen by psychiatric services. Psychiatrists should consider anti-NMDAR encephalitis in patients presenting with psychosis as well as dyskinesia, seizures, and/or catatonia, especially if there is no history of a psychiatric disorder. We present the case of a 37-year-old woman who demonstrated many of the key clinical features of this potentially treatable disorder.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 43%
Psychology 16 20%
Neuroscience 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 9 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2021.
All research outputs
#991,570
of 19,542,586 outputs
Outputs from Journal of psychiatric practice (Print)
#37
of 353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,339
of 168,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of psychiatric practice (Print)
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,542,586 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.