↓ Skip to main content

Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007058.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melissa Whitworth, Leanne Bricker, James P Neilson, Therese Dowswell, Whitworth, Melissa, Bricker, Leanne, Neilson, James P, Dowswell, Therese

Abstract

Diagnostic ultrasound is a sophisticated electronic technology, which utilises pulses of high frequency sound to produce an image. Diagnostic ultrasound examination may be employed in a variety of specific circumstances during pregnancy such as after clinical complications, or where there are concerns about fetal growth. Because adverse outcomes may also occur in pregnancies without clear risk factors, assumptions have been made that routine ultrasound in all pregnancies will prove beneficial by enabling earlier detection and improved management of pregnancy complications. Routine screening may be planned for early pregnancy, late gestation, or both. The focus of this review is routine early pregnancy ultrasound.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
France 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 107 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 21%
Student > Bachelor 23 19%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 28 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Unspecified 9 7%
Psychology 5 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 20 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,453,664
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,013
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,001
of 131,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.