You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surviving critical illness: what is next? An expert consensus statement on physical rehabilitation after hospital discharge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-016-1508-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. E. Major, R. Kwakman, M. E. Kho, B. Connolly, D. McWilliams, L. Denehy, S. Hanekom, S. Patman, R. Gosselink, C. Jones, F. Nollet, D. M. Needham, R. H. H. Engelbert, M. van der Schaaf |
| Abstract |
The study objective was to obtain consensus on physical therapy (PT) in the rehabilitation of critical illness survivors after hospital discharge. Research questions were: what are PT goals, what are recommended measurement tools, and what constitutes an optimal PT intervention for survivors of critical illness? A Delphi consensus study was conducted. Panelists were included based on relevant fields of expertise, years of clinical experience, and publication record. A literature review determined five themes, forming the basis for Delphi round one, which was aimed at generating ideas. Statements were drafted and ranked on a 5-point Likert scale in two additional rounds with the objective to reach consensus. Results were expressed as median and semi-interquartile range, with the consensus threshold set at ≤0.5. Ten internationally established researchers and clinicians participated in this Delphi panel, with a response rate of 80 %, 100 %, and 100 % across three rounds. Consensus was reached on 88.5 % of the statements, resulting in a framework for PT after hospital discharge. Essential handover information should include information on 15 parameters. A core set of outcomes should test exercise capacity, skeletal muscle strength, function in activities of daily living, mobility, quality of life, and pain. PT interventions should include functional exercises, circuit and endurance training, strengthening exercises for limb and respiratory muscles, education on recovery, and a nutritional component. Screening tools to identify impairments in other health domains and referral to specialists are proposed. A consensus-based framework for optimal PT after hospital discharge is proposed. Future research should focus on feasibility testing of this framework, developing risk stratification tools and validating core outcome measures for ICU survivors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 22 | 19% |
| United States | 11 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 9 | 8% |
| Australia | 7 | 6% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 48 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 70 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 22% |
| Scientists | 18 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 313 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 15% |
| Researcher | 38 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 10% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 62 | 20% |
| Unknown | 80 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 82 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 2% |
| Psychology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Unknown | 96 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#565,460
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#368
of 6,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,743
of 320,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#9
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.