↓ Skip to main content

The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 1,063)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
97 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1745 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1807 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Michie, Michelle Richardson, Marie Johnston, Charles Abraham, Jill Francis, Wendy Hardeman, Martin P. Eccles, James Cane, Caroline E. Wood

Abstract

CONSORT guidelines call for precise reporting of behavior change interventions: we need rigorous methods of characterizing active content of interventions with precision and specificity.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,807 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 30 2%
United States 14 <1%
Australia 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Norway 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 1736 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 415 23%
Student > Master 357 20%
Researcher 295 16%
Student > Bachelor 167 9%
Unspecified 157 9%
Other 415 23%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 448 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 303 17%
Unspecified 278 15%
Social Sciences 195 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 142 8%
Other 440 24%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2019.
All research outputs
#136,009
of 13,753,853 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#23
of 1,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,339
of 147,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,753,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.