You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What Makes Clinical Research in Developing Countries Ethical? The Benchmarks of Ethical Research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Infectious Diseases, February 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1086/381709 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ezekiel J. Emanuel, David Wendler, Jack Killen, Christine Grady |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 43% |
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 8 | <1% |
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1086 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 246 | 22% |
| Researcher | 144 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 138 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 112 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 62 | 5% |
| Other | 235 | 21% |
| Unknown | 192 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 311 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 116 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 92 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 7% |
| Psychology | 36 | 3% |
| Other | 266 | 24% |
| Unknown | 225 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
#387,216
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#323
of 15,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321
of 63,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#1
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.