↓ Skip to main content

Setting ecologically relevant targets for river pollutant loads to meet marine water quality requirements for the Great Barrier Reef, Australia: A preliminary methodology and analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Ocean & Coastal Management, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Setting ecologically relevant targets for river pollutant loads to meet marine water quality requirements for the Great Barrier Reef, Australia: A preliminary methodology and analysis
Published in
Ocean & Coastal Management, July 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.09.028
Authors

Jon E. Brodie, Stephen E. Lewis, Catherine J. Collier, Scott Wooldridge, Zoe T. Bainbridge, Jane Waterhouse, Michael A. Rasheed, Carol Honchin, Glen Holmes, Katharina Fabricius

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 127 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 23%
Student > Master 13 10%
Other 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 31 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 43 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 13%
Engineering 6 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 41 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2016.
All research outputs
#6,963,672
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ocean & Coastal Management
#728
of 2,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,545
of 326,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ocean & Coastal Management
#14
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.