↓ Skip to main content

Setting ecologically relevant targets for river pollutant loads to meet marine water quality requirements for the Great Barrier Reef, Australia: A preliminary methodology and analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Ocean & Coastal Management, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Setting ecologically relevant targets for river pollutant loads to meet marine water quality requirements for the Great Barrier Reef, Australia: A preliminary methodology and analysis
Published in
Ocean & Coastal Management, July 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.09.028
Authors

Jon E. Brodie, Stephen E. Lewis, Catherine J. Collier, Scott Wooldridge, Zoe T. Bainbridge, Jane Waterhouse, Michael A. Rasheed, Carol Honchin, Glen Holmes, Katharina Fabricius

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 21%
Student > Master 8 15%
Other 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Unspecified 5 10%
Other 15 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 19 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 19%
Unspecified 9 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 8%
Engineering 3 6%
Other 7 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,794,568
of 12,262,458 outputs
Outputs from Ocean & Coastal Management
#231
of 1,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,318
of 264,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ocean & Coastal Management
#12
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,262,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.