↓ Skip to main content

Unique in the Crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 93,765)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
677 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
996 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unique in the Crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2013
DOI 10.1038/srep01376
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye, César A. Hidalgo, Michel Verleysen, Vincent D. Blondel

Abstract

We study fifteen months of human mobility data for one and a half million individuals and find that human mobility traces are highly unique. In fact, in a dataset where the location of an individual is specified hourly, and with a spatial resolution equal to that given by the carrier's antennas, four spatio-temporal points are enough to uniquely identify 95% of the individuals. We coarsen the data spatially and temporally to find a formula for the uniqueness of human mobility traces given their resolution and the available outside information. This formula shows that the uniqueness of mobility traces decays approximately as the 1/10 power of their resolution. Hence, even coarse datasets provide little anonymity. These findings represent fundamental constraints to an individual's privacy and have important implications for the design of frameworks and institutions dedicated to protect the privacy of individuals.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,437 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 996 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 26 3%
United Kingdom 15 2%
Germany 7 <1%
France 6 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Australia 4 <1%
Switzerland 4 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Other 29 3%
Unknown 894 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 271 27%
Researcher 179 18%
Student > Master 171 17%
Student > Bachelor 68 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 46 5%
Other 168 17%
Unknown 93 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 348 35%
Social Sciences 136 14%
Engineering 93 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 39 4%
Physics and Astronomy 32 3%
Other 207 21%
Unknown 141 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1960. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,260
of 17,426,172 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#32
of 93,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9
of 161,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,426,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them