You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tidal evolution of the Moon from a high-obliquity, high-angular-momentum Earth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature19846 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matija Ćuk, Douglas P. Hamilton, Simon J. Lock, Sarah T. Stewart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 15% |
| Japan | 5 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Ghana | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 47 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 68 | 80% |
| Scientists | 14 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 25% |
| Researcher | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Professor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 45 | 40% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 26 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 614. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#37,045
of 25,623,883 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3,261
of 98,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#734
of 319,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#68
of 1,022 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,623,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,022 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.