You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-7547-11-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Don Husereau, Michael Drummond, Stavros Petrou, Chris Carswell, David Moher, Dan Greenberg, Federico Augustovski, Andrew H Briggs, Josephine Mauskopf, Elizabeth Loder, on behalf of the CHEERS Task Force |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 16% |
| Researcher | 26 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 20% |
| Unknown | 37 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 17% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 16 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 47 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2013.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#363
of 543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,612
of 212,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.