Do television and electronic games predict children's psychosocial adjustment? Longitudinal research using the UK Millennium Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Disease in Childhood, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 3,431)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
379 tweeters
facebook
71 Facebook pages
googleplus
11 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
video
6 video uploaders

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do television and electronic games predict children's psychosocial adjustment? Longitudinal research using the UK Millennium Cohort Study
Published in
Archives of Disease in Childhood, March 2013
DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301508
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison Parkes, Helen Sweeting, Daniel Wight, Marion Henderson, Parkes A, Sweeting H, Wight D, Henderson M, A. Parkes, H. Sweeting, D. Wight, M. Henderson

Abstract

Screen entertainment for young children has been associated with several aspects of psychosocial adjustment. Most research is from North America and focuses on television. Few longitudinal studies have compared the effects of TV and electronic games, or have investigated gender differences.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 379 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 6%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Ireland 2 2%
Belgium 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 89 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Other 31 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 42%
Social Sciences 17 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 12%
Computer Science 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Other 21 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 649. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2017.
All research outputs
#3,638
of 7,430,852 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood
#3
of 3,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50
of 115,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood
#1
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,430,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.