You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Achieving the triple bottom line in the face of inherent trade-offs among social equity, economic return, and conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1217689110 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin S. Halpern, Carissa J. Klein, Christopher J. Brown, Maria Beger, Hedley S. Grantham, Sangeeta Mangubhai, Mary Ruckelshaus, Vivitskaia J. Tulloch, Matt Watts, Crow White, Hugh P. Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 16% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Fiji | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 63% |
| Scientists | 10 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 641 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 2% |
| Unknown | 588 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 130 | 20% |
| Researcher | 121 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 102 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 5% |
| Other | 125 | 20% |
| Unknown | 94 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 213 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 131 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 48 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 29 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 3% |
| Other | 63 | 10% |
| Unknown | 139 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#713,256
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#11,881
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,771
of 214,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#88
of 994 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 994 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.