The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social media use among young rheumatologists and basic scientists: results of an international survey by the Emerging EULAR Network (EMEUNET)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209718 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elena Nikiphorou, Paul Studenic, Christian Gytz Ammitzbøll, Mary Canavan, Meghna Jani, Caroline Ospelt, Francis Berenbaum |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 8% |
| India | 3 | 4% |
| South Africa | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 46 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 54% |
| Scientists | 15 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 20% |
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2024.
All research outputs
#926,052
of 26,281,700 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#398
of 7,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,907
of 323,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#7
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,281,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.