↓ Skip to main content

Monetary incentives for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monetary incentives for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007626.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosanna Michalczuk, Amy Mitchell

Abstract

There is evidence suggesting that people with serious mental illness are less responsive to everyday social rewards such as praise. Motivation and performance in social situations can be poor. Rewarding of tasks with money improves motivation to complete the tasks in everyday life. Careful use of targeted monetary rewards could also help people with troublesome symptoms of schizophrenia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 100%
Greece 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 1500%
Unspecified 5 500%
Student > Master 5 500%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 500%
Researcher 5 500%
Other 12 1200%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 1600%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 1200%
Unspecified 5 500%
Social Sciences 4 400%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 300%
Other 7 700%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,860,057
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,627
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,867
of 144,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.