↓ Skip to main content

Brain Changes in Long-Term Zen Meditators Using Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Diffusion Tensor Imaging: A Controlled Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
16 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brain Changes in Long-Term Zen Meditators Using Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Diffusion Tensor Imaging: A Controlled Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0058476
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolás Fayed, Yolanda Lopez del Hoyo, Eva Andres, Antoni Serrano-Blanco, Juan Bellón, Keyla Aguilar, Ausias Cebolla, Javier Garcia-Campayo

Abstract

This work aimed to determine whether (1)H magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) are correlated with years of meditation and psychological variables in long-term Zen meditators compared to healthy non-meditator controls.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 272 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 15%
Student > Master 42 15%
Student > Bachelor 41 15%
Researcher 34 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 10%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 42 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 96 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 11%
Neuroscience 27 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 58 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2022.
All research outputs
#891,879
of 23,506,079 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,044
of 201,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,624
of 198,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#266
of 5,378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,506,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.