You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Masculinity and femininity in the divergence of male body image concerns
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Eating Disorders, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2050-2974-1-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stuart B Murray, Elizabeth Rieger, Lisa Karlov, Stephen W Touyz |
| Abstract |
Given recent assertions suggesting that gender role endorsement may be relevant in the divergence of male body image concerns, this study examined the self-reported gender role endorsement in opposing dimensional extremes of male body image disorders, namely, muscle dysmorphia and anorexia nervosa. This study further examined the relationship between gender role endorsement and eating disordered and muscle dysmorphia disorder pathology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 45 | 36% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 34 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,151,260
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eating Disorders
#79
of 784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,337
of 197,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eating Disorders
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.