The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Providing Indigenous Peoples with the appreciation of their languages? Discursive problems in the differentiation of Brazilian indigenous schools
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, September 2015
|
DOI | 10.1590/1984-639820156311 |
Authors |
Carlos Maroto Guerola |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 33% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 33% |
Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 1 | 33% |
Linguistics | 1 | 33% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada
#6
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,842
of 276,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them