↓ Skip to main content

Expert perspectives on global biodiversity loss and its drivers and impacts on people

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 1,632)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
64 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
165 tweeters
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expert perspectives on global biodiversity loss and its drivers and impacts on people
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, July 2022
DOI 10.1002/fee.2536
Authors

Forest Isbell, Patricia Balvanera, Akira S Mori, Jin‐Sheng He, James M Bullock, Ganga Ram Regmi, Eric W Seabloom, Simon Ferrier, Osvaldo E Sala, Nathaly R Guerrero‐Ramírez, Julia Tavella, Daniel J Larkin, Bernhard Schmid, Charlotte L Outhwaite, Pairot Pramual, Elizabeth T Borer, Michel Loreau, Taiwo Crossby Omotoriogun, David O Obura, Maggie Anderson, Cristina Portales‐Reyes, Kevin Kirkman, Pablo M Vergara, Adam Thomas Clark, Kimberly J Komatsu, Owen L Petchey, Sarah R Weiskopf, Laura J Williams, Scott L Collins, Nico Eisenhauer, Christopher H Trisos, Delphine Renard, Alexandra J Wright, Poonam Tripathi, Jane Cowles, Jarrett EK Byrnes, Peter B Reich, Andy Purvis, Zati Sharip, Mary I O’Connor, Clare E Kazanski, Nick M Haddad, Eulogio H Soto, Laura E Dee, Sandra Díaz, Chad R Zirbel, Meghan L Avolio, Shaopeng Wang, Zhiyuan Ma, Jingjing Liang, Hanan C Farah, Justin Andrew Johnson, Brian W Miller, Yann Hautier, Melinda D Smith, Johannes MH Knops, Bonnie JE Myers, Zuzana V Harmáčková, Jorge Cortés, Michael BJ Harfoot, Andrew Gonzalez, Tim Newbold, Jacqueline Oehri, Marina Mazón, Cynnamon Dobbs, Meredith S Palmer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 165 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Master 6 11%
Unspecified 6 11%
Other 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 26%
Unspecified 7 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 610. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#28,368
of 22,121,923 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#8
of 1,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#933
of 330,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,121,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.