↓ Skip to main content

Evaluación de la efectividad de un programa de atención integrada y proactiva a pacientes crónicos complejos

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta Sanitaria, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluación de la efectividad de un programa de atención integrada y proactiva a pacientes crónicos complejos
Published in
Gaceta Sanitaria, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.07.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordi Coderch, Xavier Pérez-Berruezo, Inma Sánchez-Pérez, Elvira Sánchez, Pere Ibern, Marc Pérez, Marc Carreras, José M. Inoriza

Abstract

To assess the effectiveness of a proactive and integrated care programme to adjust the use of health resources by chronic complex patients (CCP) identified as potential high consumers according to a predictive model based on prior use and morbidity. Randomized controlled clinical trial with three parallel groups of CCP: a blinded control group (GC), usual care; a partial intervention group (GIP) reported in the EMR; a total intervention group (GIT), also reported to primary care (PC). Conducted in an integrated health care organization (IHCO), N=128,281 individuals in 2011. Dependent variables: PC visits, emergency attention, hospitalizations, pharmaceutical cost and death. intervention group, age, sex, area of residence, morbidity (by clinical risk group) and recurrence as CCP. ANOVA, student's t test; logistic and multiple linear regressions at the 95% confidence level. 4,236 CCP included for the first intervention year and 4,223 for the second; recurrence as CCP 72%. Mean age 73.2 years, 54.2% women and over 70% with 2 or more chronic diseases. The number of PC visits was significantly higher for GIT than for GIP and GC. The hospital stays were significantly lower in GIP. This effect was observed in the first year and in the second year only in the new CCP. The general indicators of the IHCO were good, before and during the intervention. A high standard of quality, previous and during the study, and the inevitable contamination between groups, hindered the assessment of the marginal effectiveness of the program.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 15%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Professor 6 5%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 42 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 24%
Unspecified 5 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 43 32%