You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differential impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol consumption between Scottish men and women: controlled interrupted time series analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054161 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jürgen Rehm, Amy O'Donnell, Eileen F S Kaner, Eva Jane LLopis, Jakob Manthey, Peter Anderson |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 30 | 41% |
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 33 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 79% |
| Scientists | 10 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 26% |
| Researcher | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1223. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#10,673
of 24,546,092 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#17
of 24,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#437
of 424,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#2
of 832 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,546,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 832 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.