↓ Skip to main content

Adapt or die: how the pandemic made the shift from EBM to EBM+ more urgent

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 1,343)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1402 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adapt or die: how the pandemic made the shift from EBM to EBM+ more urgent
Published in
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, July 2022
DOI 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-111952
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trisha Greenhalgh, David Fisman, Danielle J Cane, Matthew Oliver, Chandini Raina Macintyre

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,402 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Librarian 4 7%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 29%
Unspecified 10 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 10 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 788. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2023.
All research outputs
#19,947
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#7
of 1,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#707
of 434,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.