You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adapt or die: how the pandemic made the shift from EBM to EBM+ more urgent
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-111952 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Trisha Greenhalgh, David Fisman, Danielle J Cane, Matthew Oliver, Chandini Raina Macintyre |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,483 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 165 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 141 | 10% |
| United States | 134 | 9% |
| Australia | 80 | 5% |
| Chile | 42 | 3% |
| Ireland | 15 | 1% |
| Spain | 12 | <1% |
| Germany | 11 | <1% |
| Brazil | 9 | <1% |
| Other | 130 | 9% |
| Unknown | 744 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1130 | 76% |
| Scientists | 183 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 144 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 24 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 15 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Librarian | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 23% |
| Unknown | 23 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 835. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#20,587
of 24,512,028 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#11
of 1,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#724
of 425,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,512,028 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.